The American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) Annual Meeting is held each year and brings together over 5000 scientists and doctors from all over the world who are experts in sports medicine and exercise science. This year the meeting was held in the home town of the ACSM – Indianapolis, Indiana. Unfortunately this year had very few tennis studies that were presented – only 3 presentations on tennis and 2 of them were case study examples. Fortunately hundreds of studies from around the world were presented on topics that have relevance to tennis athletes.  Below is a short summary providing some of the major highlights. If you are an iTPA member, please visit the Inner Circle Member site (http://www.itpamembers.org ) which has a much more detailed summary with abstracts of dozens of relevant studies for individuals who work with tennis athletes.

Effect of Competitive Match Play on Handgrip Strength in Division III Tennis Players

George L. Hoyt, III, Andrew L. Sykes. Methodist University, Fayetteville, NC.

A rather simple study was conducted looking at the effect of competitive matchplay on grip strength in In Division III male tennis players. The results of the study found that the athletes showed significant ratings of fatigue after the matchplay, but did not show any difference in grip strength. This study is interesting because it highlights that feelings of fatigue does not necessarily show a decrease in grip strength in the population measured.

The take-home is that subjective feelings of fatigue may not be always linked to actually a decrease in performance. It is important to understand that just because an athlete is fatigued, does not mean that they cannot continue to perform at a high level. Just be careful not to overdo this principle which can result in a situation of overtraining or a constant state of fatigue.

Here are some other take homes from research that was presented:

-       Functional Movement Screen (FMS) was shown to be a poor predictor of non-contact overuse injury in college athletes. However, performance on the lunge movement did show some promise in predicting injury.

-       An interesting study evaluating the walking/running mechanics of 2 and 3 year old children found that excellent runners vs inferior runners at that age had different mechanics. This may suggest the need to develop technique at a younger age than first thought.

-       A separate study also on 3 year old children found that children that took longer steps were able to throw a ball further. Also, children with higher motor abilities at that age (measured by scores on 7 different motor ability tests) could transfer muscular strength and power of lower limb to ball speed better than children with lower motor abilities.

-       In a baseball study focused on shoulder strength and power in high school baseball players, a six week training program focused on either:

1) controlled motion exercises (using bodyweight, dumbbells & tubing)

2) explosive motion exercises using constant air resistance machines

3) plyometrics (explosive motion exercises using 4-8lb medicine balls & tubing)

All three programs were effective in increasing shoulder strength & power. Group 1 was most effective in increasing shoulder strength, while groups 2 & 3 were most effective in increasing shoulder. Therefore, it would be acceptable to conclude that a combination of all three training programs would be beneficial for tennis athletes to improve strength and power in the shoulder region.

-       Heart Rate Variability (HRV) has inconsistent results in the literature and may not be a valuable tool to monitor overtraining

-       The Relative Age Effect (RAE) is attainment inequalities as a result of interactions between biological age and age-grouping procedures. In simple terms it is when an older kid (i.e. someone born in February is perceived to be more athletic than a younger kid (i.e. born in December) and chosen for teams or talent squads over the younger kid. A very good study found the influence of the RAE varies across age groups, but is most pronounced  between the ages 9-12. This is very important for coaches and parents to understand that during this time period, a 6-12 month difference in birth month can have a major impact on perceived sports competency.

-       When working with older adults higher speed resistance training (i.e. power training) improves peak power but also shifts the point at which peak power was produced to lower external resistances. This is beneficial for older populations.

-       In a different study also focused on power training in the older population, functional fitness is positively influenced by muscular power.

-       Consumption of leucine-enriched essential amino acids mixture suppressed exercise-induced muscle damage and muscle soreness (DOMS), and aided muscle recovery.

-       In college athletics the majority of the athletes use at least one dietary supplement. However, the overall nutrition and dietary supplement knowledge is inadequate.

-       A study looking at basketball camp found that parents descriptions of an optimal motivational environment involved focusing children on their effort, improvement and positive interactions with other campers and coaches.

 
 
Three Lessons Learned From the 2013 Australian Open
Picture
1. Novak Djokovic's Recovery Capabilities

This has to be the most impressive aspect of the entire tournament.  After more than a five hour marathon beating Stan Wawrinka, Novak was able to come back and easily dispose of Tomas Berdych and David Ferrer in dominating fashion. He then outlasted Andy Murray in the final. Many questions arose from the media and behind the scenes about how he could recover and play great tennis after such a physical and punishing match. Novak employs many different techniques to help improve recovery, from a strict diet to different modalities involving massage, cold and warm water treatments and other technologies to speed recovery. However, the biggest aspect of recovery is how hard the athlete trains leading into the tournament.
_


Picture
2. Andy Murray's Blisters

After the hundreds of hours of pre-season work by Andy Murray, he came into the Australian Open in great physical shape and moved through the first few rounds of the Australian in devastating form. He came into the Open final looking good and played well in the first couple of sets. Then he called the trainer to work on a major blister on the inside of his left foot. As most of you are aware, bad blisters can be devastating for a tennis athlete due to the constant stop, start nature and the hundreds of movements that the athlete goes through in every match. Unfortunately, something as simple as blisters derailed Andy's chance of really contending at 100% for the last 2 sets of the final. This is an important lesson to everyone working with competitive athletes. The athlete is only as strong as his or her weakest link. Although every major factor was accounted for in Andy's training leading to the final, the one area that led to his downfall was something as simple as blisters. This is an important lesson to teach all athletes. Everything needs to be accounted for when preparing for a major tournament - including blisters.


Picture
3. Serena Williams Injury

Serena was a strong favorite going into the Australian Open this year; she was looking very strong in the lead up tournament in Sydney.  During her first round she rolled her right ankle 19 minutes into the match. On television it appeared to be rather severe, but she was able to still win her match 6-0 6-0 but with very little movement. Even though it was obvious that her movement was impeded, she continued to win through to the Quarterfinals where she faced the young American Sloane Stephens. Midway through the match while running for a short ball Serena aggravated a back injury which was noticeably painful. Although it is impossible to say with certainty,  the weakened ankle likely led to compensation up the leg and lower back, and this weakness and compensatory movements led her back to require movements that were atypical. This atypical movement likely was the cause of the back injury. This is an important concept to remember at any level of the game. It is important to take care of any injury (no matter how small) as an injury in the lower body can, at some point, have a deleterious effect on other parts of the body.


To Summarize:

  • Focus on maximizing training to help improve recovery
  • An athlete is only as strong as his or her weakest link
  • Always take care of any injury when it occurs so that the body does not overcompensate and cause a more severe reaction somewhere else in the body
 
 
This post adds to the great video post from the ITPA’s Certification Commissioner Dr. Todd Ellenbecker discussing recovery. If you have not seen this video please review in the post below.

Do you know some important terms when it comes to Fatigue and Recovery?

Fatigue -  The decreased capacity or complete inability of a muscle or muscles to function normally because of excessive stimulation or prolonged exertion.
 
Overtraining – results from an accumulation of training and non-training stressors that has a detrimental long-term effect on performance, with a recovery period that may take several weeks or months.  This needs to be avoided via a well structured periodized training program limiting the chance of overtraining.

Overreaching – A normal process of training. The accumulation of training and non-training stressors that lead to a short-term decrease in performance, which can be overcome with a recovery lasting a few days. This is the purpose of effective periodized heavy training, but many times coaches, trainers and parents sometime let this stage last too long and it turns into overtraining which is highly unproductive and potentially.

Repair - The damage and repair cycle is beneficial only if the repair portion of the cycle results in greater, strength, power and endurance than before the damage/repair cycle started.

Continue to plan, periodize and effectively structure, daily, weekly and monthly plans to limit the chance of overtraining and perform at peak conditioning when it matters the most.

Here is a simple diagram highlighting a typical training and recovery curve and the dotted line represents an athlete who is under-recovered/overtrained.